Matter-of-fact admission of lawlessness from Michelle Obama is nothing new

2010 April 4

It’s one thing to pull a fast one over on a nation by covering up some lawless deed you’ve done, but more and more frequently, we are seeing members of the oligarchy (ruling class) admit freely in passing to various illegal behaviors, with no apparent concern for keeping them secret any longer.

Like Congressman Bart Stupak’s brazen admission that they could pass health care reform without having to amend the Constitution, or like Congressman Phil Hare’s admission that he doesn’t “worry about the Constitution” when it comes to passing health care reform, we now have Michelle Obama referring freely in passing that she and her husband, Barack, went to “his home country in Kenya”.

In no way can such a statement be good.

Surely, Kenya is not Obama’s current home. So we can safely rule that out as a possible meaning of Mrs. Obama’s statement. That leaves us with two other choices: that he was born there, or that he lived there in the past. Does she mean to tell us that he was born there? If so, she is telling us that he is not a natural born citizen of the US, and cannot legally be the president. And if she is NOT telling us that, shouldn’t she go to great lengths to make her true meaning plain? That is, if she has the natural concern for the rule of law that one would expect of a First Lady?

Let us give her the benefit of the doubt and assume for a moment that all she meant to convey is that her husband once lived in Kenya. Why, then, call it his “home country”? If indeed he thinks of Kenya as his “home”, how then can he be mentally fit to rule the United States as one who belongs here? And again, shouldn’t she be striving to avoid being perceived as saying that Mr. Obama considers himself to have a “home” other than the US? Wouldn’t that be a scandalous thing to report? Well, it would if she were not impudent and if the nation were not dull.

See her here, addressing the LGBT Delegate Luncheon, and spilling the beans, as it were. The remark in question is at 0:41 seconds.

Again, no version of this statement’s intent could be good. Just like Joe Biden whispering to Barack Obama near a microphone that the passing of the health care reform bill is “a big f*ing deal”, Mrs. Obama’s confidence in uttering such a statement shows an utter disregard for the Rule of Law in the United States. Indeed, she is not even keeping up appearances.

Why on earth would we want a president who does not consider the United States to be his “home country”?

I believe that we will see the oligarchs making more and more of these braggart and brazen statements as their grip on the nation’s control strengthens. Indeed, from David Rockefeller’s own memoirs we see a chilling admission that he is a supporter of a one-world government:

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Isn’t this the sort of thing that the Honorary Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations might want to keep mum about?  Yet he is proud to say it aloud.

And here’s where things get sticky for the Republicans, for the CFR is not a Democrats-only body.  Indeed, the membership list is just as stacked with Republicans as with Democrats.  And lest someone argue that the Republicans are on board with the CFR in order to keep globalists like Rockefeller from having his way, we have but to point out Bush 41, whose infamous mentions of the “New World Order” are plastered across the Internet:

Bush lauds “a world where the rule of law…governs the conduct of nations”. How interesting that he and so many other CFR faithfuls are so keen on this “rule of law” idea while they defiantly violate our own Constitution repeatedly. If the Rule of Law does not work here in the United States, folks, it’s not going to work across the world. Why, then, should we trust lawless rulers here with governing the world?

Well, why not….since it’s going so well having a Kenyan rule the US for a change?

Their audacity is becoming commonplace. Things that should draw shocked gasps from the national audience are raising little more than a murmur. Meanwhile, we are being conditioned to gasp at things that we are told are  really atrocious, like people wanting to own guns, or teaching their children to distrust the government.

Is it not obvious that these tyrants have absolutely no fear of this docile public?

Shame on us.

Indeed, the most they have to fear from this public is that the Democratic wing of the CFR will lose in the Fall, and that the Republican wing of it will win.

Americans had to form their own government once upon a time when tyranny under a foreign government had become intolerable.  Today, we have the option of filtering through all the candidates for office and choosing only those that will swear ahead of time to obey the Constitution and nothing but.  But instead of doing that, the nation seems hellbent on voting Republican this fall.

In my house, however, we don’t put spoiled milk back in the refrigerator—as if it might be better tomorrow.

But so continues the false left-right paradigm and the endless slipping down the slippery slope of lawlessness.

2 Responses leave one →
  1. April 13, 2010

    Well written!

  2. gailkatherine permalink
    April 29, 2010

    ‘. . . all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, that to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed.’

    It is time to abolish the DemRep control of our country by electing citizen legislators after eliminating all but citizenship and age as a requriement for any elective office.

    Only by refusing to elect a single career politican to a single office can we Restore the Republic.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.